Web ApplicationPenetration Testing
Synopsys OSSRA 2025 found 84% of codebases ship with known vulnerabilities, and Veracode reports only 27% of critical flaws get fixed within 30 days. OSCE³/OSWE-certified testing finds the business-logic and auth bypasses scanners miss before attackers collect a $3,000 bounty on your app.
OSCE3 Certified
OSWE Certified
OWASP-Based Testing
Zero False Positives
2-Week Engagements
Why Choose Expert-Driven Testing?
96% of modern applications depend on open-source components, and 84% carry known vulnerabilities attackers actively exploit. Automated DAST and SAST tools cannot validate business-logic flaws, chained auth bypasses, or API abuse. OSCE³/OSWE-certified manual testing delivers verified findings with business-context risk ratings and zero false positives.
Complete OWASP Top 10 Coverage
Testing aligned with the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) and current Top 10 risk categories, including 2025 updates on broken access control, software supply chain, and SSRF. Every finding manually verified with proof-of-concept exploitation.
A01 Broken Access Control
IDOR, path traversal, privilege escalation, insecure direct object references, missing function level access control
A02 Cryptographic Failures
Weak encryption, sensitive data exposure, insecure transmission, broken SSL/TLS, weak hashing algorithms
A03 Injection
SQL, NoSQL, OS command, LDAP, XPath injection, ORM injection, template injection, expression language injection
A04 Insecure Design
Business logic flaws, workflow bypasses, race conditions, missing security controls, threat modeling gaps
A05 Security Misconfiguration
Default credentials, unnecessary features, verbose errors, missing security headers, unpatched systems
A06 Vulnerable Components
Outdated libraries, known CVEs, supply chain risks, vulnerable dependencies, unmaintained software
A07 Authentication Failures
Broken session management, credential stuffing, weak passwords, missing MFA, session fixation
A08 Data Integrity Failures
Insecure deserialization, code injection, CI/CD pipeline attacks, auto-update without verification
A09 Security Logging Failures
Insufficient logging, missing monitoring, inadequate alerting, log injection, tamperable logs
A10 Server-Side Request Forgery
SSRF attacks, internal network access, cloud metadata exploitation, port scanning, bypass controls
Beyond OWASP Top 10
PCI-DSS Web Application Testing
PCI-DSS Requirement 6.4.3 requires web application security testing for payment systems. I deliver OWASP-aligned assessments with attestation letters your QSA can accept, without the generic scanner output that fails audit scrutiny.
OWASP-Based Testing
OWASP WSTG methodology mapped to PCI-DSS 6.4.3, covering injection, access control, and authentication the way auditors expect, not how scanners approximate it
Compliance Reporting
Requirement-mapped reports with executive summaries and attestation letters, evidence your QSA needs, not a raw vulnerability export
Annual & Change Testing
Annual baseline and post-change validation so new releases do not reintroduce the flaws HackerOne researchers would report for a $3,000 critical bounty
Testing Services
Web App Pentesting
Full OWASP WSTG coverage: authentication, authorization, injection, business logic, and session management. Manual exploitation with proof-of-concept for every critical finding.
API Security Testing
REST, GraphQL, and SOAP testing for BOLA, broken authentication, rate-limit bypass, mass assignment, and injection, where modern breach chains actually start.
Compliance Testing
PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and SOC 2 focused assessments with requirement-mapped reporting and attestation letters your auditors can act on.
The Process
OWASP WSTG methodology with manual verification at every stage, because Veracode's 2025 data shows automated tools alone cannot close the remediation gap
Reconnaissance & OSINT
Attack surface mapping, exposed credentials, API discovery, and SSL/TLS analysis, building the same picture a bug bounty hunter would
Manual Expert Testing
Full OWASP Top 10 and WSTG coverage plus business-logic abuse, auth bypass chains, and creative exploitation beyond scanner playbooks
Detailed Reporting
Executive summary, technical findings with PoC evidence, prioritized remediation steps, and a live debrief your engineers can ask questions in
Common Questions
How long does it take?
Most engagements run 2-4 weeks depending on application complexity, API surface area, and authentication scope
What makes you different?
OSCE³/OSWE certified expertise with manual verification on every finding: no scanner noise, only exploitable vulnerabilities with business-context risk ratings
Automated scanner vs manual testing?
Scanners miss business-logic flaws, chained auth bypasses, and API abuse. I manually exploit and document every critical finding with proof-of-concept evidence
Production or staging?
Staging is preferred for depth testing. Production testing is available for PCI-DSS compliance with coordinated windows and safe exploitation techniques
Ready to Secure Your Applications?
Get a detailed assessment of your security posture from an OSCE3-certified operator.
Get in Touch